And once the webbers start adding javascript borrowed syntax, there would even be dissent in the parser. ![]() Microsoft Visual Basic only lasted 7 short years: 1991 to 1998. And yes, I want a StringGadget not an EditGadget or any other type. ![]() But I still cant figure out the X (column) position. A bit of base syntax is simply not enough commonality for it to be in the same project as a base, native compiler.Įverything FB has outside the basic parser would just be unnecessary luggage, and the differing requirements would only cause strife between web and native devels. (Edit) I can get the Y (line) position with this: ySendMessage (GadgetID (StringGadget),EMLINEFROMCHAR,-1,0)+1. The main point is that such effort would have to come from one of the Basic interpreters or from a new project, not from the compilers, like FB. How do I do that I cant even seem to get the line number I was editing never mind the cursor position within that line Thanks. There is a point though to that provocative statement: while one could argue about adding more weblanguages that are virtually indistinguishable to Javascript except for some basic syntax is pointless, assume that need as a given for now. I want to be able to drag text from a ListIconGadget and drop it into an EditorGadget at the point where the cursor was before I moved it from the EditorGadget to the ListIconGadget. If I wanted to code Ruby or BASIC on the web, would that be so bad? ![]() Even with standard web technologies, there are alternatives such as HAML (for HTML), LESS and SASS (for CSS), and server-side processing languages such as Razor (for C# "cshtml" views in MVC.). Anonymous1337 wrote:I think having syntax options on the web are a good thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |